Kickback Jack's is facing a lawsuit from the EEOC for allegedly discriminating against male applicants in their hiring process for front-of-house positions.
 |
| The EEOC has filed a lawsuit against Kickback Jack's, alleging that the company's hiring practices are discriminatory against male applicants. Symbolic Image |
Greensboro, North Carolina, USA – September 26, 2024:
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) has filed a lawsuit against Battleground Restaurants, Inc. and Battleground Restaurant Group, Inc., the parent companies of the popular Kickback Jack's restaurant chain, alleging systemic gender discrimination in their hiring practices.
The EEOC claims that the companies have a long-standing policy or practice of intentionally excluding male applicants from non-managerial front-of-house positions, such as servers and hostesses. Despite operating numerous restaurants across North Carolina, Virginia, and Tennessee, the companies' workforce is overwhelmingly female, with only a small percentage of male employees in these roles.
According to the lawsuit, the EEOC has gathered substantial evidence to support its claims, including witness testimony, documents, and statistical data. Witnesses have reported that male applicants were routinely rejected for front-of-house positions, even when they met all the qualifications and were more experienced than female candidates.
The EEOC argues that this discriminatory practice violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on sex in employment. The agency contends that the companies' actions have resulted in significant economic harm to male job seekers, who have been denied opportunities for employment and advancement.
In addition to seeking monetary relief for a class of victims, including back pay, compensatory damages, and punitive damages, the EEOC is also requesting injunctive relief to prevent the companies from engaging in similar discriminatory practices in the future. The agency is demanding that the companies implement measures to ensure that their hiring practices are fair and non-discriminatory.
"Title VII does not allow employers to exercise hiring preferences based on sex without a legitimate business justification," said Melinda C. Dugas, regional attorney for the EEOC's Charlotte District. "The evidence in this case clearly demonstrates that Battleground Restaurants has engaged in a pattern of discriminatory conduct that has had a significant impact on the lives of male job seekers."
The lawsuit has sparked a public debate about gender bias in the restaurant industry. Some critics argue that the companies' hiring practices reflect traditional gender roles, which often assign women to service-oriented professions. Others contend that the companies may have legitimate business reasons for their hiring decisions, such as customer preferences or operational needs.
The EEOC's lawsuit against Kickback Jack's is expected to be a high-profile legal battle that could have far-reaching implications for the restaurant industry and the enforcement of equal employment opportunity laws. The outcome of the case will likely depend on the strength of the evidence presented by both sides and the interpretation of Title VII by the court.